<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CES &#8216;08: Alienware&#8217;s Wraparound Gaming Monitor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webranding.org/2008/01/07/ces-08-alienwares-wraparound-gaming-monitor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webranding.org/2008/01/07/ces-08-alienwares-wraparound-gaming-monitor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: T.K.</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/2008/01/07/ces-08-alienwares-wraparound-gaming-monitor/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>T.K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/2008/01/07/ces-08-alienwares-wraparound-gaming-monitor/#comment-314</guid>
		<description>I read somewhere else it had a .02 second response time (no lag)!  I'd love to play me some Halo on that thing.  Best part is since it is DLP there is no burn-in either!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere else it had a .02 second response time (no lag)!  I&#8217;d love to play me some Halo on that thing.  Best part is since it is DLP there is no burn-in either!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
