<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>weBranding &#187; Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webranding.org/category/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webranding.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook  Memology 2011</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/facebook-memology-2011/</link>
		<comments>http://webranding.org/facebook-memology-2011/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 11:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook Memology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mashable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/?p=6736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mashable has a huge round-up of year-end 2011 Facebook stats. Most popular memes, movies, sport teams, shared news stories, you name it. Interesting read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6737" title="Facebook Top Global Trends (2011)" src="http://webranding.org/images/facebook_memology_2011.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="449" /></p>
<p>Mashable has a <strong><a href="http://mashable.com/2011/12/07/facebook-reveals-2011s-most-popular-status-trends/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29">huge round-up</a></strong> of year-end 2011 Facebook stats. Most popular memes, movies, sport teams, shared news stories, you name it. Interesting read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webranding.org/facebook-memology-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tablet &amp; eReader Demographics</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/tablet-ereader-demographics/</link>
		<comments>http://webranding.org/tablet-ereader-demographics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2011 11:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-mail Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eReader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on Earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/?p=4104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really some pretty amazing data from Mashable: Women are particularly taking to ereaders, according to data from Nielsen. Sixty-one percent of ereaders are now owned by women, compared to 46% in the third quarter of 2010. This largely why many women’s magazines are reporting better sales on the Nook than the iPad. The data also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://webranding.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tablet_ereader_demographics.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4105" title="Tablet &amp; eReader Demographics" src="http://webranding.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/tablet_ereader_demographics.png" alt="" width="642" height="391" /></a></p>
<p>Really some pretty <a href="http://mashable.com/2011/08/25/ereader-tablet-nielsen-women-stats/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29"><strong>amazing data from Mashable</strong></a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Women are particularly taking to ereaders, according to data from <strong><a href="http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/?p=28695" target="_blank">Nielsen</a></strong>. Sixty-one percent of ereaders are now owned by women, compared to 46% in the third quarter of 2010. This largely why many women’s magazines are reporting <strong><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/23/business/media/23nook.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">better sales</a></strong> on the Nook than the iPad.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The data also shows that smartphone use is now divided 50/50 between men and women, a 3% shift from the third quarter of last year. Tablet ownership is still dominated by men (67%), although less so than it was last year, when men owned 71% of all tablets.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The biggest shift in tablet ownership demographics is in age. In Q3 2010, 62% of tablet owners were under the age of 34 and a mere tenth were older than 55. Now,only 46% of tablet owners are younger than 34 and 29% are older than 55.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I follow this stuff, and when I am talking to folks that don&#8217;t, they always seem to assume males dominate the marketshare of video games, smartphones, tablets, you name it. Rarely if ever is that the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webranding.org/tablet-ereader-demographics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>REPORT: Facebook Branding Beats Twitter</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/report-facebook-branding-beats-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://webranding.org/report-facebook-branding-beats-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand Loyalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flickr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foursquare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google buys youtube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LinkedIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/?p=3758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This brief article at All Facebook caught my attention: Facebook’s brand effectiveness outranks all other social media’s branding efforts, according Brand Keys’ Customer Loyalty Index. The index measures customer engagement and loyalty among brands in 79 different categories, one of which is social networking sites. This category has enough surprises to make us wonder whether Brand [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This<a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/report-facebook-branding-beats-twitter-2011-02"><strong> brief article</strong></a> at All Facebook caught my attention:</p>
<blockquote><p>Facebook’s <strong><a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/facebook-brand-advocate-2010-10" target="_blank">brand effectiveness</a></strong> outranks all other social media’s branding efforts, according Brand Keys’ Customer Loyalty Index.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=144422" target="_blank">The index</a></strong> measures customer engagement and loyalty among brands in 79 different  categories, one of which is social networking sites. This category has  enough surprises to make us wonder whether Brand Keys’ assessment used  sufficiently sized survey samples.</p>
<p>Brand Keys ranks<strong> <a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/as-myspace-implodes-facebook-becomes-unstoppable-2011-01" target="_self">MySpace</a></strong> second, LinkedIn third, Flickr fourth and Twitter fifth. We’d expect to  see Twitter and the old News Corp. site in each other’s places. Or  maybe MySpace shouldn’t even be in the top five, as many other sites  have stronger brands, including FourSquare, Quora, Tumblr, YouTube and  Yelp, not neccessarily in that order.</p></blockquote>
<p>﻿</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webranding.org/report-facebook-branding-beats-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter&#8217;s Growth: 2007-2010</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/twitters-growth-2007-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://webranding.org/twitters-growth-2007-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter's Growth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/?p=3675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Sources: SEOmoz, Twitter Facts, TG Daily, and Mashable]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://webranding.org/images/twitter-growth-2007-2010.gif" alt="" width="550" height="394" /></div>
<p style="text-align: right;"><small>[Sources: <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/social-media-marketing-facebook-twitter-arent-enough?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+seomoz+%28SEOmoz+Daily+Blog%29"><strong>SEOmoz</strong></a>, <a href="http://twitterfacts.blogspot.com/2008/01/number-of-twitter-users.html"><strong>Twitter Facts</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.tgdaily.com/software-brief/52284-twitter-on-pace-to-reach200-million-users-by-2011"><strong>TG Daily</strong></a>, and <a href="http://mashable.com/2009/01/09/twitter-growth-2008/"><strong>Mashable</strong></a>]<br />
</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webranding.org/twitters-growth-2007-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook&#8217;s Growth: 2004-2010</title>
		<link>http://webranding.org/facebooks-growth-2004-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://webranding.org/facebooks-growth-2004-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 17:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook's Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webranding.org/?p=3674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[Sources: SEOmoz &#38; Facebook]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://webranding.org/images/facebook-growth-2004-2010" alt="" width="550" height="321" /></div>
<p style="text-align: right;"><small>[Sources: <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blog/social-media-marketing-facebook-twitter-arent-enough?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+seomoz+%28SEOmoz+Daily+Blog%29"><strong>SEOmoz</strong></a> &amp; <a href="http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?timeline"><strong>Facebook</strong></a>]</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://webranding.org/facebooks-growth-2004-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

